Tag Archive for drama

Of Note: Certified Copy Blu-ray: Criterion Collection

I’ve praised the film Certified Copy before. I believe that writer/director Abbas Kiarostami made a brilliant meditation on how we develop relationships. It’s beautiful, it’s sharply written, and the leading performances from Juliette Binoche and William Shimell are extraordinary.

certifiedcopycriteriondisc Of Note: Certified Copy Blu ray: Criterion Collection

The Criterion Collection cover of Certified Copy is deceptively simple

This week, Certified Copy finally came out on DVD and Blu-ray. The gray cover of the Criterion Collection is rather unappealing at first glance. It’s a shame they chose that shade because the dull frame belies a really cool visual trick. The split image of Binoche and Shimell is a reflection of itself. If you know the film already, it comes from the scene where the pair are wandering through an art gallery, neither one exactly thrilled with the quality of the work. The cover is a great play on the conceit of the film, with the characters evaluating their own performances in the relationship that might not exist.

But obviously, you don’t judge a book by the cover. The Criterion Collection has more than enough to keep a fan happy. The footage has been remastered with a newly mixed 5.1 surround sound presentation. There are special features like commentaries, interviews, and even a rare short from Kiarostami’s early career.

Yet the coolest, must have feature of the Criterion Blu-ray is the essay included in the case. Godfrey Cheshire re-contextualizes Certified Copy as a reflection of Abbas Kiarostami’s creative life. Though the director is no stranger to risks, something big had to motivate him to work entirely outside of Iran for the first time.

Cheshire proposes that the increased censorship and political action taken against filmmakers in Iran pushed Kiarostami to work outside of the country. The film confirms a deeper philosophical discussion of the value of art in society. Both characters take on the role of an oppressive force, fighting against the value of the other’s view of art and refusing to relent on any points. Instead of opening a dialogue, they fabricate excuse after excuse to pretend that any issue is caused by the other person, not a fundamental disagreement on the role of art in the world.

Though I hadn’t noticed the parallels before, Cheshire’s argument is a compelling one. I think it overreaches just a bit when you take Juliette Binoche’s original audition/interview into consideration. Kiarostami described the story of Certified Copy and then claimed everything had really happened to him. She responded with shock and he said he was lying. Then she tried to convince him that it was the truth but he wouldn’t budge. Her reactions helped define her character in the film.

While politics can be applied to the story, I think the true art of the narrative is building narrative about creating art. You have no idea if anything you saw was true, yet it feels so real by the end that you have to believe it. Except you know for a fact that they made a lot of things up as they went along. Except for how you have no proof of that.

For all the bells and whistles on the Criterion Collection Blu-ray, this essay–accompanied by lovely stills intentionally split in half from the film–will mostly likely be what causes me to pull Certified Copy off the shelf again and again. The film is great on its own. The essay and the added features open it up for further analysis. It’s an ambiguous story that might be more open than I ever imagined on first viewing.

So will you be picking up Certified Copy? I’d love to hear your thoughts on the film. Share them below.

Film Review: Pariah (2011)

It’s so hard to retell a story that has been told so many times before. In the case of Pariah, it’s almost unfair to say that it’s just a coming out story. Yet describing it as a coming of age story where a bright teenage girl begins to explore her real identity despite the consequences is just as short-sighted. They’re both accurate descriptions of the film. I just think that labeling Pariah as this or that is a great disservice to a beautiful film.

pariahmirror Film Review: Pariah (2011)

Alike cannot hide her discomfort in just pleasing her family any longer in Pariah

Writer/director Dee Rees adapts her own short Pariah into a brilliant feature film. The Pariah is Alike (ah-lee-kay), a 17 year old high school student with everything going for her. She’s smart, she gets good grades, she has a loving family, and she’s a very good poet. She’s also a lesbian who doesn’t want to come out to her family. Her best friend Laura, a high school drop out, takes her out to clubs to break her out of her shell. Alike has built her life into an elaborate balancing act between her home identity, her school identity, and her exploration of sexuality after dark.

In an odd way, Dee Rees did a lot of things the “wrong” way to make her film come to life. Most of the actors playing the lead teenage roles are much older. Fortunately, Adepero Oduye (Alike), Aasha Davis (Bina, a girl Alike is forced to befriend by her mother), and Pernell Walker (Laura) pass as much younger then they are in real life. The risk of casting actors (some are almost twice as old as their characters) that can handle substance rather than actors physically closer to the characters pays off with strong and natural performances. Melodrama slips into their performances because teenagers are, as a rule, very dramatic. The choices work to create believable teenage characters.

The visual scheme of Pariah, in theory, would fight against this realistic approach. Dee Rees pulls elements from melodrama and European arthouse films to tell Alike’s story. Relationships are defined in a glance by positioning onscreen.

Perhaps my favorite scene in the film involves Bina and Alike walking to school. Alike walks ten feet in front of Bina, begging her to go away. They round a corner and suddenly Bina is leading them to the school (same distance), with Alike begging Bina not to rat her out to her mother. It’s such a subtle trick that is repeated with height, framing, and camera angle in every scene. The person in charge is always physically in the stronger position.

pariahgolden1 Film Review: Pariah (2011)

Laura is a guiding light for Alike in Pariah

More striking is the use of colors. I already compared the use of bright blue, red, green, gold, purple, and orange to the work of Dario Argento last week. In the same way that the staging of characters defines power, the use of color defines the emotional stakes of every scene. Alike is cast in vibrant colors when she can safely explore her sexuality. When she’s out in public, she’s torn between multiple colors (usually the last color of the safe place she was in and a jarring contrast, like red and green) and with her family she’s forced to face reality in bright white or yellow. Dee Rees simultaneously creates a safety net of visual fantasy and opens up the story for greater emotional resonance with her dance of light.

I have one small complaint about the film. I think Pariah would have benefited from a more natural approach to Alike’s family relationship. Alike and her sister act like actual siblings you’d see in the real world. When her family is happy, their behavior is filled with the normal ribbing and tension between teenagers and parents. But when the parents (the mother especially) confront Alike about problems, the interactions are uncharacteristically stylized.

Until the halfway point of the film, the family is very natural in its interactions. There’s tension but not melodrama. The growing rift between Alike and her mother (and her mother and father) plays like a soap opera in the middle of a documentary. It’s an odd tonal shift. I get the theory–Alike’s life becomes overwhelmed with the heightened emotions and fantasy of her hidden nightlife–but I think it goes just that little bit too far to really hit home.

pariahorange Film Review: Pariah (2011)

The use of color to tell Alike's story is masterful

Fortunately, Pariah does not dwell on Alike’s family life alone. So much of her identity is explored in beautiful and unexpected ways that it’s easy to ignore how jarring that one conflict becomes.

Pariah is one of the more exciting feature narrative debuts in years. If there is any justice, this will be just the first of many great films that Dee Rees gets to bring to life. The whole cast deserves big breaks after this film. Any of the major players could easily carry a film on their own with their level of talent. It would be a mistake not to find 86 minutes to watch this film.

Rating: 9/10

Thoughts? Love to hear them.

Hit Me With Your Best Shot: Pariah (2011)

Hit Me With Your Best Shot is a series of posts over at The Film Experience. Nathaniel programs a series of films to watch each week and choose your favorite still from. This week centers on Pariah and should really bring about a lot of discussion.

Back when I made my Top 10 Films of 2011 list, I specifically mentioned that I had to exclude Pariah because I hadn’t seen it. Now I have and I can gladly report that it would easily have made the list. Top half, even. I’m enamored of it.

pariahgolden Hit Me With Your Best Shot: Pariah (2011)

Pariah is all about the use of color to define storytelling.

A big reason for the success of the film is the visual quality. Dee Rees put together a strong screenplay and directed her cast to some magnificent performances. However, it is the use of light that makes Pariah rise above similar stories.

Pariah is the story of Alike (uh-lee-kay), or Lee as she likes to be called. Lee is a straight-A high school student, a talented writer, and a lesbian coming to terms with her sexuality.

Dee Rees fills the screen with color anytime Lee is able to explore her true identity. She uses leading lady Adepero Oduye’s skin as a canvas and all the gels and filters as paint. Rees paints her red, gold, purple, blue, orange, and green every chance she gets. It’s just the perfect device to get into the psyche of a teenage poet coming to terms with her own existence.

pariahdeereesargento Hit Me With Your Best Shot: Pariah (2011)

Dee Rees' use of color could leave any Argento fan breathless.

The cinematography of Pariah is masterful. Within two minutes, I was already mentally comparing the style to Argento. Every shot is carefully constructed to include as many precision washes of color as needed to tell the story. One character will be red, another blue, another cast in shadow. The backdrop will be red but Lee’s face in green against a stark black border.

But perhaps the most arresting use of color happens early on in the film. Lee’s mother tries to force her to act and dress more like a young woman. In response, Lee packs her school bag with baggy clothes and baseball caps every day, waits for the bell to ring, then changes into her own style. A popular girl takes notice of her hiding in the hallway and drops the hint that she might be into Lee.

pariahbestshot Hit Me With Your Best Shot: Pariah (2011)

"I like girls, but I love boys."

Lee is cast in a light blue hue against the shadow. The color is mirrored in the metal framing around the windows. More significant is the invasion of bright colors during the day for the first time in Pariah.

Lee is not out at the beginning of the film. Not really. She has a friend, Laura, who encourages her to go to clubs and pick up girls, but otherwise she’s just a tomboy figure in the community. It takes another girl at school appreciating her for her true self to unleash multiple colors during the day. Lee is cast in blue, but the windows are filled with the rest of the film’s color palette–red, orange, yellow, blue, purple, and green.

pariahclub Hit Me With Your Best Shot: Pariah (2011)

Lee is overwhelmed by possibility at the club.

A film cannot rest on visuals alone and really work as a film. Fortunately, in the case of Pariah, the use of color washes elevates a strong story and cast into a piece of art. The fantasy of it all makes it more accessible and more honest at the same time. Dee Rees creates a clear divide between Lee’s two world’s and refuses to play into expectations of what a realistic character study/drama should look like.

The result is a film that reflects the character of Lee perfectly. It’s beautiful inside and out and does not need to conform to anyone’s expectations to succeed.

Thoughts? Love to hear them.

Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

In this edition of Instant Watch, we’re going to take a look a three films all about alternatives to traditional education available to stream at Netflix. Even when a traditional classroom is in the picture, the behavior of the students and staff alike push it beyond the boundaries of your standard public school experience. It is by coincidence alone that all three films were nominated for Academy Awards. Maybe the Oscars are big on films that comment on education.

Half Nelson (2006)

Something is going on with 8th grade history teacher Dan Dunne. He refuses to follow the set curriculum out of boredom, pushing students to examine the entire history of the world through dialectics. Mr. Dunne is addicted to cocaine. His student Drey finds him in the girl’s locker room, high. They begin to form a friendship over the shared secret, forcing them both to confront their understanding of their lives, the education system, and how friendship really works.

halfnelsonhallways Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

Dan Dunne wanders into school late for the first time.

Half Nelson is a very relaxed film. There are no emotional highs, no sustained fights, and only one scene where anyone’s voice rises above proper classroom behavior. The great strength of the film is how underplayed the dramatic arcs are.

Ryan Gosling is Dan Dunne. There is not a moment in the film where he steps out of the downward spiral of a man who believes he finally has his life under control. Everything, from the disinterested saunter into the school building to his over inflated sense of self, rings true. The fate of Half Nelson relies on this performance and Ryan Gosling makes everything feel real and effortless. It’s enough to make you worry that your local teachers might get away with this behavior.

halfnelsondre Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

Drey watches out for her teacher in Half Nelson

Perhaps the most cliched element of Half Nelson is the mandatory bond between teacher and student in an education drama. However, Drey is not your typical student relying on a teacher for guidance. Shareeka Epps gives a strong and nuanced performance as Mr. Dunne’s student who uncovers his drug addiction. It would be so easy for Drey to become this magical child who completely changes everyone’s life who encounters her. With Epps’ performance, she’s not. She’s not perfect. She’s not a bright spot in a troubled world. She’s simply a child getting by with a mother who can’t afford to spend more time at home.

Half Nelson refuses to meet your expectations. This is not the typical public school drama. There are no troubled youth needing redemption. There is no major test or challenge the students have to overcome. In fact, the classroom scenes are only used as a framing device to gauge the changes in Dan Dunne. There’s subtext about the Civil Rights movement, but it’s never drawn to the forefront. The white teacher becomes friends with his black student and worries about her safety.

Writers/directors Ryan Fleck and Anna Boden do a remarkable job staying away from what you expect in a teaching drama. This is a character study of a man who refuses to open up beyond a glint in his eyes. It’s a coming of age story where the young girl is already more adjusted to reality than the adults teaching her. It’s a study in drug abuse that chooses to show how well people can get by in society while high.

Half Nelson is a film that slowly washes over you. Dan Dunne draws you in with his confidence, then leaves you to piece together the rest yourself. For people willing to actively engage with a film that has no easy answers, Half Nelson is a rewarding viewing.

Rating: 8/10

preciousdinner Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

Precious faces dueling educational forces in her life.

Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire (2009)

preciouscoloregirls Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

Director Lee Daniels pushes Precious to be an inspirational but realistic look into a young woman's psychological development.

Precious is one of those films I’ve been obsessed with since it came out. Part fantasy, part drama, part deeply psychological character study, director Lee Daniels’ powerful feature about a sexually and psychologically abused 16 year old teenager takes a challenging novel and turns it into a piece of cinematic magic. It must have been hard to imagine how a story so driven by internal monologues and terrible abuse could translate to the screen. Lee Daniels takes Geoffrey Fletcher’s Academy Award winning adaptation of Sapphire’s novel Push and turns it into the kind of film that makes you appreciate the magic of filmmaking.

Perhaps the saddest part of Precious‘ legacy is the cultural narrative of the film. Despite incredible direction, writing, performances, design, and editing, Precious could have been subtitled “The Mo’Nique Show.” It is true that Mo’Nique gives an outstanding performance as Precious’ abusive mother Mary. She is not a caricature of an abusive parent or a cartoonish villain. Mary is terrifying because she is all too real. There are clear mental health problems happening that Mary has no interest in addressing. So long as she gets her welfare check on the basis of living with Precious and lying about caring for her granddaughter, she’s fine with whatever happens in her life.

preciousschool Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

Precious is greeted by her new teacher at the alternative school.

The reason the focus on Mary and Mo’Nique’s performance is so unnerving is the caliber of acting in the film. If Mary didn’t exist as a character, any number of the other women in the film would have stolen all the focus in the supporting cast. Paula Patton actually behaves like the teachers I work with. She takes the role of a teacher at an alternative school for troubled young women and wrings out every possible special moment. Mariah Carey goes toe to toe with Mo’Nique and Gabourey Sidibe as their welfare agent and manages to steal focus while confined to a rolling chair in a gray cubicle. Even smaller players like Sherri Shepherd as the school’s secretary and Xosha Roquemore as a wacky classmate bring much needed warmth and humanity to the film.

Gabourey Sidibe plays Precious to perfection. It’s so hard to describe what she does in this film. She’s the narrator discussing her life experience in voice over. She’s the superhero of her own fantasies, the villain in her own reality, the epitome of self doubt to her new teacher, and the worst mistake in the history of the world to her mother. She is a child forced to grow up too fast, a woman incapable of understanding her life beyond her relationship to her mother and father, and a person trapped in a pattern of escapism. Sidibe needs more screenplays that showcase what she can do. It is a sin to waste this much talent on bit parts in ensemble comedies.

The problem with Precious is one of branding. This became the film known for the abusive mother and the troubled child rather than the far more positive direction and arc of the film. Precious is a victim who forces herself to improve her life. She goes to school, she makes friends, and she slowly comes to terms with her worth as a person. She dreams big–could she be a movie star? a rockstar? a model? happy? fulfilled? confident?–and finds a way to overcome the obstacles in her life.

Precious is not a depressing film. It is joyful. It is heartfelt. It is beautiful and inspiring and realistic even in its use of fantasy to explore the human psyche. Does the tone make the terrible abuse easier to watch? Barely. The film is balanced between the dark and the light in a way that naturally brings out the best and worst in every moment. It is a lifetime of experiences distilled down to one year of a young woman’s life. If you have about two hours and feel up to it, Precious will not let you down.

Rating: 10/10

dogtoothparty Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

The siblings of Dogtooth celebrate their teachers/parents' wedding anniversary.

Dogtooth (2009)

dogtoothchildren Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

The siblings of Dogtooth are adults trapped as young children by their parents.

Dogtooth is a strange film by design. Writer/director Giorgos Lanthimos and co-writer Efthymis Filippou craft a story of educational abuse unlike any other. Father and Mother teach their three adult children–Son, Older Daughter, and Younger Daughter–false definitions of words and bizarre lies about the outside world to confine them to their large remote home for life. Their only chance for escape is the loss of their dogtooth (right or left, doesn’t matter), which means they are old enough to walk through the gate and not be killed instantly.

Dogtooth doesn’t really have a story. It’s a meandering look into a bizarre and abusive family. The children haven’t developed psychological reasoning beyond small children because their parents wouldn’t let them. They compete in dangerous games and tasks to earn stickers on their bed frames. They’re savagely punished if they step out of line and rewarded with more indoctrination if they do well.

dogtoothdoctor Instant Watch: Alternative Schools

The siblings in Dogtooth invent strange games to occupy their time.

Its so hard to understand what, exactly, is happening in Dogtooth. It’s not a character study as the characters don’t evolve or show depth beyond their initial introduction. If it’s meant to be a comedy, it is very dark and bloody. The gags are dry and the abuse going on is hard to swallow.

What I fear is that Dogtooth might be losing a lot in translation. It’s a Greek film with a lot of flatly delivered dialogue. My suspicion is that, with the readily available subtitles, we’re losing out on clever wordplay and idioms that don’t translate well. Perhaps it’s a fitting satire of a Greek cultural or political institution. I just don’t have the frame of reference to judge it in that context.

The reason I’m so torn on Dogtooth is that I enjoyed watching it in spite of how little sense it made. It felt very much like Lars von Trier’s The Idiots, only without an accessible lesson or theme to grab onto. The family does strange things just to do strange things and the technical filmmaking makes them interesting. The film has a fantastic eye for color and framing that makes it a perverted piece of moving art.

It’s hard to recommend Dogtooth beyond a twisted sense of curiosity. I remember a lot of writers were very confused that this received a nomination for Best Foreign Language Film at the Academy Awards. It’s just so strange that it’s hard to imagine its audience. It’s not campy enough for the cult fans, dark enough for the horror fans, or absurd enough for post modern comedy fans or Modernists. It is a self-contained exploration of a twisted educational fantasy and doesn’t strive to be anything more.

Rating: 5/10

Thoughts on these films? Suggestions of other alternate schooling films on Netflix? Sound off below.

Film Review: Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (2011)

At this point, I’m considering that TYCP project a wash. They have a big old stack of reviews from me and haven’t posted one since Haywire came out. Since I’m overwhelmed with music work on this, the week where the show I’ve been working on has its entire run, I’m posting some of those reviews.

extremelyloudandincrediblycloseoskar Film Review: Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (2011)

Oskar goes on an expedition in Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close

Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close is a drama about coping with catastrophic loss. Namely, a boy losing his father in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. But Oskar Schell isn’t just an ordinary boy. He has undiagnosed mental health issues that cause him extreme anxiety around people. His father used to set up expeditions for Oskar that forced him to interact with people in NYC. A year after the death, Oskar finds a key in an envelope and is convinced his father wanted him to find the lock it goes to.

You cannot fault Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close for its ambition. Director Stephen Daldry films Oskar’s world with such style that every corner in NYC looks brand new and exciting. He travels all over the five boroughs from the perspective of a child, always looking up at the immense buildings and the sea of people filling the sidewalks and subways.

The problem is that this style does not work for all the stories contained in the film. For every scene that is so powerful you’ll want to stand up and cheer, there’s another scene that is so dull, lifeless, and manipulative that you’ll want to walk out of the theater. The tone is horribly inconsistent. Whenever the film tries to comment on Oskar’s condition or the motivation for his quest, it stumbles.

The most accomplished scenes in Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close are the events of September 11, 2001, where we see Oskar or his mother (but never his father) reacting to the attack. Daldry manages to find a rhythm and intensity to these scenes that feels real. They do not feel exploitative or manipulative. Even when the content is shocking, like a recurring motif of a man jumping from the towers, it feels right and justified by Oskar’s story.

The problem is that the narrative thrust of the film–Oskar’s search for the key’s lock–doesn’t hold up on its own. Where another screenplay would have played up the adventure elements and character, Eric Roth’s adaptation of Jonathan Safran Foer’s novel constantly retreats into the safety of Oskar’s neuroses. This means that characters outside of his immediate family become two dimensional plot points on his quest.

extremelyloudincrediblycloseposter 202x300 Film Review: Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close (2011)

Oskar wasn't the only one covering his face during this film.

Any emotion you’re supposed to feel from Oskar’s interactions with his grandmother’s tenant, for example, doesn’t come across at all because the man has no character. Max von Sydow is compelling only because he’s Max von Sydow. You cannot divorce his early scenes from an overly foreshadowed twist that is obvious from his first appearance. The same applies to all recurring non-immediate family characters. Stephen Daldry wastes a large and talented ensemble cast, including Viola Davis, Zoe Caldwell, and John Goodman, because he gives them no direction beyond “say your lines and cry here.”

The problem is that Daldry did not know what he wanted to get out of this film. It’s a lackluster adventure, a strange character study with no growth, a coming of age story, a tight family drama, and an emotionally resonant tribute to 9/11. Together, these elements overpower each other and underwhelm as a cohesive film.

All of that is a shame. Edited down to the key plot points and visual motifs, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close would be a masterpiece. The sound design, cinematography, score, and captivating debut performance from young Thomas Horn are almost enough to make this film work. There’s enough good in the film to make it worth watching, but not enough to make it as great as it should have been.

Rating: 5/10

And yes, there’s a whole other post that I slapped a rating on. I just wanted the traffic from LAMB.

Film Review: The Iron Lady (2011)

A biopic seems like a hard thing to mess up. If you have an interesting subject and a good cast, there shouldn’t be an issue. Pick out the major highlights of a person’s life and throw them at the screen. It might not be the most eloquent or innovative film, but it will make sense.

Writer Abi Morgan and director Phyllida Lloyd are not content to just bring the life of Margaret Thatcher to the screen in The Iron Lady. They want to make a topical film about the modern history of terrorism. They want to show the impact of the Conservative movement in British Parliament in the 1980s. They want to sanctify Margaret Thatcher as a woman, vilify her as a politician and mother, and punish her with her own husband’s death ala an ancient Greek tragedy.

Any one of these approaches would have had enough content to fill a feature length film. Thrown all together with a bizarre flourish for melodrama, whispers, and random explosions, none of them come out making much sense. The Iron Lady is a film that suffers not from ambition but from artistic greed. Why make one good film when you can go for style and weight over cohesion and substance? If people don’t get it, that means they don’t appreciate cinematic art.

theironladymerylstreep Film Review: The Iron Lady (2011)

Meryl Streep is limited to volume and gait.

Meryl Streep has elevated some questionable films in the past with a strong leading performance. Her Margaret Thatcher doesn’t even have a chance. Encased in an unflinching mask of prosthetics, Meryl Streep has to rely on gimmicky walks and volume to show any change in character.

If Abi Morgan wanted to write a character study of a woman overcome with grief and the early stages of Alzheimer’s, she should have written a character study of a woman overcome with grief and the early stages of Alzheimer’s. The manipulative framing device of The Iron Lady is the death of Denis Thatcher, Margaret’s husband.

Margaret doesn’t really understand that Denis is dead. He eats breakfast with her. He gets ready for the day with her. He even helps her relive her triumphs and failures as a politician, wife, and mother. Denis is the specter of her past, refusing to let her move on in the present. He has haunted her for six years at this point and the illusion of his presence is only just beginning to crack.

It feels like half the film is set in the haze of grief and Alzheimer’s, which does nothing to create any excitement for the livelier flashbacks. The most successful moments in the film are the flashbacks to Thatcher’s earliest foray into politics. From her acceptance into Oxford to her first electoral defeat and straight through to her first landslide victory, the young Margaret (played by Alexandra Roach) gets more believable scenes than any other section of the film. Too bad she gets only a few minutes of screen time in the entire feature.

theironladyparliament Film Review: The Iron Lady (2011)

The Iron Lady is a film at war with itself.

The Iron Lady is a mess of a feature that has no idea what it wants to be. The Alzheimer’s story plays like a spoof of a haunted house film. The earliest flashbacks are the earnest story of a woman with dreams of being important. The rise to party leader and early years as Prime Minister are played as a cautionary tale about abandoning everything you stand for to achieve success. The policy battles in parliament are strange pastiches of shouts, disembodied voices, longing gazes, and historical footage to show the opposition’s views more clearly than Thatcher’s. And the repeated footage of explosions from the IRA and Al Qaeda are a senseless grab for topicality in a story that is relevant on its own with the economic troubles in the EU and the US. It’s as if no one trusted the story of Margaret Thatcher to stand up as a film on its own.

Say what you will about Margaret Thatcher’s politics. Her life story has made for interesting films in the past. With Meryl Streep at the helm, The Iron Lady should have soared above the by the numbers biopics with great ease. Instead, it’s overly manipulative pandering to critics that couldn’t even succeed in showcasing a phenomenal actress in a juicy role.

Rating: 2/10

Thoughts? Love to hear them.

Film Review: Albert Nobbs (2011)

Albert Nobbs is a strange little film. It is a bittersweet fairy tale in the tradition of Hans Christian Anderson. It does not have the high fantasy or grotesque elements of the Grimm Brothers nor the sugar-coated delicacy of Disney. It is a a minor tragedy centered around an exceptional individual who makes the mistake of stepping outside of himself.

albertnobbsposter Film Review: Albert Nobbs (2011)

The love triangle of Albert Nobbs: the Maid, the Waiter, and the Handyman

Albert Nobbs has successfully disguised himself as a man for most of his life. From the age of fourteen, he has become a self-sufficient and highly sought after professional waiter in the finest British hotels and banquet halls. A chance encounter with another woman disguised as a man, Hubert Page, rocks his world, pushing him into strange new social situations and altering the safe and steady path to his dream.

Glenn Close pulls quadruple dutys on the film, starring, writing, producing, and even composing the cathartic lullaby that ends the picture. With her co-writers John Banville and Gabriella Prekop, Close creates a world thriving with life in Nobbs’ hotel/home. Each character, no matter how minor, is full-bodied and alive. The waiters all have their own backgrounds; same for the maids, guests, and owner. This means that even when Albert is not in a scene, the film does not suffer from artificiality.

albertnobbsglennclose Film Review: Albert Nobbs (2011)

Glenn Close becomes Albert Nobbs

All Albert Nobbs suffers from is a lack of Albert Nobbs. Despite being front and center in most scenes, Albert is missing from a key series of scenes that are all about him. Hubert Page convinces Albert Nobbs to take a wife. Nobbs sets his sights on Helen, a young maid, who is madly in love with Patrick, a handyman. Patrick convinces Helen to use Albert for financial gain. These scenes–essential to the story–feel out of place without the quiet gaze of Albert Nobbs. As soon as Albert is back onscreen, the story comes alive again. Without him, it stops dead in its tracks.

The double-edged sword of Albert Nobbs is the character of Hubert Page. There is no story without him. The film wants to be the story of this strange little man Albert Nobbs but Albert does not live in a bubble. For good and ill, Hubert Page drives the story. He exists to open up Albert to a larger world he never imagined. With Hubert’s arrival, the story has to shift outside of Albert’s life to make sense. Without Hubert’s interference, there would be no conflict and no story.

It’s so hard to reconcile these few distractions with what is otherwise such a sweet, sincere, and lovable film. You want to love the film Albert Noobs more than the titular character is capable of expressing. He has hidden his emotions and personal life for very good reasons and is still capable of being everyone’s most trusted ally. Close wisely refuses to let his voice go louder than a normal speaking tone (and that’s at his most panicked state) or move in any way that suggests less than professional behavior. Nobbs is a closed book who only cracks open his cover a tiny bit under the brute force of Hubert Page.

albertnobbsjanetmcteer Film Review: Albert Nobbs (2011)

Janet McTeer is unwavering as Hubert Page

Janet McTeer has the hardest role in Albert Nobbs playing Hubert Page. It is her job to pass for a man–same as Close–only her man is loud, boisterous, outgoing, and utterly normal. He is a strong tradesman, a loving husband, and a perfect foil to Nobbs. Page chooses to hide by going over the top with his confidence, while Nobbs hopes to camouflage himself in the unflinching professionalism of a waiter. McTeer doesn’t open up more than Close does even when she has every reason to burst into hysterics, rage, or fear. She’s doing everything Close does, only amplified a hundred times over.

Together, the Close/McTeer duo keep the film afloat. Albert Nobbs, with a lesser cast, would be insufferable pablum. The coincidences would be a bit too unbelievable. The plot twists would be too calculated. The sincerity of Nobbs and Page would be nonexistent. These flaws overwhelm the film when Nobbs or Page are not the center of the action.

I know that Albert Nobbs will not please everyone. I must reiterate that it is a fairy tale. It is a fluffy cloud of a film about to shift into a gentle cleansing shower. Close and McTeer bring far more depth to the story than it requires to be told. Their presence is the reason to see it.

It’s a silly little fantasy about a woman living as a strange little man that only earns its final somber turn on the backs of two accomplished performers. If you’re willing to give yourself to something beautiful, heartfelt, intentionally uneven, and even a bit odd, Albert Nobbs could be the film for you.

Rating: 7/10

Thoughts? Love to hear them.

Film Review: Warrior (2011)

Warrior is an MMA-fighting drama heavy on the schmaltz and light on the character development. Once you learn a major player’s backstory, there’s nothing else to learn about them. They might have some secrets hidden in their past, but they have no bearing on the behavior of the characters in the film. Warrior is a static exercise in melodrama that can still leave you feeling thrilled in the final few scenes.

Brothers Brendan Collin (Joel Edgerton) and Tommy Collin (Tom Hardy) used to be fighters. Brendan is now a physics teacher fighting on the side for extra cash while Tommy is a drifter. Tommy only wanders back into the picture because he wants to enter the 16 man middleweight MMA tournament with a prize of $5million for the winner. He submits himself to his former alcoholic father’s (Nick Nolte) training regime, forcing the two brothers to cope with the reintroduction of their abusive father into their lives.

warriorfilmreviewblog Film Review: Warrior (2011)

Tommy Collin preps for battle in Warrior.

Warrior thrives when the focus is put on the fighting. The bouts seem real, dangerous, and exciting. Without the hindrance of very expository dialogue, the actors are able to use their physicality to better define their roles. You might not remember all of Tommy’s absurd backstory, but you will remember his refusal to stay in the ring once his opponent is knocked out.

Writers Gavin O’Connor, Anthony Tambakis, and Cliff Dorfman are far too ambitious with their screenplay. There are four major plots that are all given equal weight: Tommy’s past, Brendan’s financial problems, Tommy and Brendan’s shared history with their father, and the 16 man MMA tournament. The stories aren’t so much resolved by the end of the film as thrown together at the last possible moment in a scene that makes the evil twin fallback of daytime soap operas seem subtle and grounded by comparison. Any of these stories could have been a good ninety minute action/drama. Instead, Warrior presents four half-baked stories broken up with strong fight scenes.

The cast does what they can with the poorly defined characters and lackluster plot development. Tom Hardy is strong as Tommy. You believe that he’s had a terrible life and is just trying to do one thing right. He’s gruff, he’s mean, he’s completely self-centered, and you can’t take your eyes off of him while he’s onscreen.

Less successful is Joel Edgerton as straight-edged brother Brendan. He’s supposed to be the good guy, so he doesn’t take one step out of line in the whole film. Sure, he takes up fighting again against the the wishes of his wife, but it’s ok. He’s a good father, a good husband, and he is doing everything he can to provide for his family. Edgerton is stuck with playing the infallible straight man and does not come out of the more melodramatic moments looking good.

Nick Nolte as the recovering alcoholic father is all over the place. I can’t tell if what he does is good or not because the character is so ill-conceived. Is saying the father was an alcoholic enough to imply the horrors he inflicted upon his family? It has to be. That’s all he’s given to work with. Ironically, the scene where his character can’t even stick to that small bit of development is when Nolte soars onscreen.

It would be one thing to deal with unwelcome melodrama in a sports picture if it was technically well-made. Though beautifully shot, Warrior has serious issues with sound design. Any scene not taking place in a ring or cage is delivered at barely audible layers. The actors all whisper their lines and nothing is done to augment or support the sound. I feel fortunate to have watched this at home because I was able to crank up the volume for non-training/fighting scenes and drop it down to human levels for the overly amplified fight scenes. There’s something to the idea of the world being a quiet and calm place outside of the octagon for the two fighters; it doesn’t have to be done in such a literal way.

In spite of its flaws, fight fans will probably walk away cheering from Warrior. I’m admittedly not the biggest fan of sports films and found myself really getting into the training montages and tournament scenes. If Warrior had focused on that rather than schmaltzy manufactured drama, it would have been a great film. Instead, it’s a film marred by too much poorly drawn exposition and not enough momentum.

Rating: 6/10

Thoughts? Love to hear them.

Film Review: Certified Copy (2011 US, 2010 France)

Certified Copy is a sweet and strange little romance about perception, artifice, and imitation. Filled with framed images of real Italian settings and naturally layered images, writer/director Abbas Kiarostami riffs on the nature of originality for 106 minutes in three languages.

Starring Juliette Binoche as Elle, a french woman living in Italy, and William Shimmel as James Miller, a British writer promoting an art criticism book in Italy, Certified Copy flows effortlessly through bizarre changes in character, tone, language, setting, and story. What starts as a simple story of a woman trying to debate an author on the merit of his work shoots off in exciting new directions as soon as Elle and James meet in an antique shop.

certifiedcopyblog Film Review: Certified Copy (2011 US, 2010 France)

Film Review: The Tree of Life (2011)

The Tree of Life gives you what you want to take out of it. Writer/director Terrence Malick (The Thin Red Line, The New World) creates an environment of compelling visual stimuli connected to the life of one man. It is a meditation on life, family, growing up, and identity.

There is no way to fault the technical execution of this film. The visual effects are magnificent. At one point, Malick takes us back to the Big Bang and the creation of the universe. This mix of natural videography and computer graphics is one of the best executed scenes I’ve ever seen in film. With no dialog to hinder the visual storytelling, it is everything a film fan could ever want and all the evidence you need to prove that film is an art form.

The great strength of The Tree of Life is its universality. Time and again I found myself drawn into the unspoken moments of the narrative because I could read whatever I wanted from them. With the actors playing concepts rather than characters, it would be hard not to find some way to connect to some facet of this film.

Unfortunately, for me, the film begins to lose its power when it tilts its hand toward specificity.

Film Review: Beginners (2011)

Beginners is a sweet tale of learning to pursue what makes you happy in life. Oliver Fields is our narrator, jumping through time over the past year to tell us the story of his dying father’s last months on Earth. Hal Fields comes out of the closet late in life and finds the man of his dreams. While we learn the story of Hal’s first true romance, we experience Oliver trying as hard as he can to overcome his childhood instinct that no relationship could ever be based in love and happiness. He meets a beautiful woman named Anna, with the help of his late father’s dog Cosmo, and tries to build a worthwhile relationship.

Beginners is not so much about the plot as it is about the psychology of the characters. The principle cast–Cosmo aside–has never allowed happiness to be an option in their lives. Oliver commits himself entirely to his work in the face of grief. Hal convinces himself that he can cure his homosexuality by being a good husband and father. Anna is constantly escaping her life in France by hopping from hotel to hotel all over the world. It is only when they open themselves up to chance that they finally start to explore the possibility of true happiness.

Writer/director Mike Mills (Thumbsucker) crafts a tight screenplay using a loose narrative structure. Though the film jumps in time, the beats of the narrative and character development are placed with precision for the benefit of this film. It’s not a traditional structure; it’s the structure that works best for Beginners. It takes a strong writer to build a screenplay that works without the go-to three act structure and Mills does it with style.

There are recurring devices that help shape the narrative. Oliver will give a historical voice-over to a series of images. “This is the president, this is what a man looks like, this is where a gay man could have sex, this is what sadness looks like,” all said in the context of the year being discussed. It flows naturally because Oliver is a graphic designer. His studio is filled with images on inspiration boards. Another device is his constant sketching of representations of his emotional state under the guise of work. The device turns into a subplot connected to how he’s functioning at work in relationship to his growth as a person.

Perhaps the most effective device is Cosmo. Cosmo is a Jack Russell Terrier. Oliver states in one of the first scenes the purpose Cosmo will serve in the film. Essentially, Cosmo acts as a criticism of the cute dog distraction in sitcoms and films by showing multiple ways a dog can be used to advance a narrative. The most blatant is Cosmo’s speech, presented in subtitles on the screen. Sometimes it’s used as a joke. Other times, Cosmo’s speech is a reflection of Oliver’s inner thought process.

beginnersblog Film Review: Beginners (2011)

The other uses of Cosmo are more impressive. Cosmo has an actual personality beyond “cute puppy.” He’s grieving the loss of his late friend Hal and has severe separation anxiety if he’s not with someone who loved Hal. It is only because Cosmo has to come to a costume party that Oliver meets Anna.

Cosmo becomes an omnipresent extension of Hal’s advice to Oliver throughout the film. If a dying man can come to terms with finding someone who makes him happy, why can’t his thirty-something son do the same? Cosmo is constantly nipping at his heels and pushing Oliver into strange new territory. The unspoken influence of the dog replaces the traditional need for a best friend or relative offering advice at every juncture. It flows organically because people don’t always have another person to guide them in life. Cosmo is Oliver, his memories, and his father wrapped up into a furry little ball that may or may not develop the ability to communicate directly with the people who love him.

It doesn’t hurt that Arthur (Cosmo) and his trainer Matilda de Cagney do amazing work with tricks, sight-lines, and general demeanor on set. Also, Arthur is an adorable little dog that the cast clearly grew fond of. That always helps. When in doubt, close-up on the adorable wire-haired terrier.

Ewan McGregor (Oliver), Melanie Laurent (Anna), and Christopher Plummer (Hal) do great work in this film. Mike Mills gave them a screenplay filled with richly developed characters and they went to town with them. Plummer’s character is the flashiest (and easiest awards magnet) and he really sells the progression, but McGregor and Laurent are at the same level. It’s one of those situations where if the main love interest wasn’t believable, the film would completely fall apart. You wouldn’t notice the actors playing Oliver and Anna unless they were doing horrible work onscreen. Their chemistry is perfect.

Beginners might stray a bit too quirky for more traditional romantic drama fan. However, for those willing to embrace a slightly skewed universe where dogs can communicate directly and history is framed by rapid fire photographs, Beginners is a beautifully realized exploration of what it means to be happy.

Rating: 8/10

Thoughts? Love to hear them.

Film Review: The Help (2011)

thehelpblog Film Review: The Help (2011)

The Help is a film designed to make people feel good about themselves. It takes a massive social issue–the Civil Rights Movement–and distills it down to a funny–almost cartoonish–and safe story of a young white woman encouraging hard working black women to do what they can to help change the world. She does this through writing. She will write a book about what it’s like for the black help to raise white family’s babies while their own children are being looked after by someone else. I doubt anyone can accuse the film (and the source novel by Kathryn Stockett) of trying to do anything harmful to the recent history a serious struggle.

The problem with The Help is not its intentions, but its execution. The screenplay by writer/director Tate Taylor feels like an over-simplification of a series of important issues. The moments in the film that should feel like a sucker-punch to the gut wash over you like the stroke of watercolor brush.

As much as Taylor tries to make this a two-hander between Skeeter Phelan (Emma Stone)–the white writer–and Aibileen Clark (Viola Davis)–the first housekeeper who agrees to the interview process–, the film ultimately feels like the story of a young white woman fighting against social norms in Alabama. Aibileen Clark has equal screentime but not equal weight in the narrative. Where every scene Skeeter’s in focuses on her, Aibileen fades into the background even when surrounded by her closest friends.

Film Review: Blue Valentine (2010)

Blue Valentine is a difficult film to watch. Not because it uses a non-linear storytelling device, jumping between the present day struggles of a married couple and the early days of their relationship, but because of the content. Shy of losing a parent, child, or partner, the film seems to hit on every realistic obstacle a person could face in life–fallen dreams, missing dog, missing parents, sick parents, jealousy, anger, and depression, to name but a few of these issues.

Dean (Ryan Gosling) and Cindy (Michelle Williams) are shown either doing everything they can to keep their marriage–their family–afloat or coyly falling in love. The jumps in time and memory are linked by parallel events. For example, after Dean slow-dances with Cindy in a cheap sex motel, the story jumps back to their first real date where Dean convinces Cindy to do a little tap dance to his song on the ukulele. The plot points always feature near-identical occurrences in their lives that play out in vastly different ways. It is safe to say that the past is a happier time than the present for the young married couple.

Film Review: I Am Love (2010)

I Am Love is a curious film. It is a melodrama that uses little dialog. It is a character study that targets three different characters in a family at the same time. It is a beautifully acted film that values artistic design and score over a clear portrayal of any character. I Am Love is less a film than a portrait of a family in motion. You get what you want to get out of the film and nothing more.

Tilda Swinton stars as Emma Rechi, a woman who was whisked away from her native Russia twenty years ago to marry an Italian business man (Pippo Delbono’s Tancredi Rechi). She has three grown children: daughter Betta (Alba Rohrwacher), sons Gianluca (Mattia Zaccaro) and Edoardo, Jr. (Flavio Parenti). Betta is going off to art school in London and Gianluca and Edoardo are joining the family textile business; Edoardo has been named co-owner of the company with his father Tancredi.